Pros and cons of tidal energy: Powered by the moon

Tidal Energy: Powered by the Moon

Every day, the moon's gravitational pull moves trillions of gallons of water around our planet, creating a massive untapped energy source beneath the waves. While we've been harnessing wind and solar for decades, tidal energy remains the sleeping giant of renewable power – predictable, powerful, and surprisingly underutilized.

Key takeaways

  • Tidal energy offers unmatched predictability, with accurate forecasts possible centuries in advance – unlike weather-dependent renewables
  • Water's density makes tidal turbines 830 times more powerful than wind turbines of the same size, requiring far less space for equivalent energy output
  • Environmental impacts on marine ecosystems remain the biggest challenge, with installation costs running 10-14 times higher than wind power

What is tidal energy and how does it work?

Picture the ocean as Earth's largest battery, charged twice daily by cosmic forces. Tidal energy captures power from the regular rise and fall of ocean waters caused by the gravitational dance between Earth, the moon, and the sun. It's renewable energy at its most fundamental – powered by celestial mechanics that have operated like clockwork for billions of years.

The moon pulls our oceans toward it as Earth rotates, creating bulges of water that we experience as high tides. When the sun aligns with the moon, we get especially strong "spring tides." This isn't just poetic – it's raw power waiting to be harnessed. Scientists estimate the global potential for tidal energy at around 500 gigawatts, roughly equivalent to 500 large nuclear power plants.

But here's where it gets interesting: unlike hoping for sunny days or windy weather, we can predict tides with stunning accuracy hundreds of years into the future. Your great-great-grandchildren could schedule maintenance on a tidal plant using calculations we make today. Try doing that with a wind farm.

Tidal predictions can be calculated accurately for the next 100 years using astronomical data, while weather forecasts struggle beyond 10 days

Types of tidal energy systems

The engineering world has developed several clever ways to capture this lunar gift. Each approach has its champions and critics, but they all share one goal: turning water movement into electricity.

Tidal barrages work like underwater dams, trapping water at high tide and releasing it through turbines as the tide falls. Think of them as hydroelectric dams that fill naturally twice a day. France's La Rance station has operated this way since 1966, proving the concept works but also highlighting its limitations.

Tidal turbines take a different approach – imagine wind turbines, but underwater. These devices spin in tidal currents without blocking entire waterways. Scotland's MeyGen project uses massive 49-foot-tall turbines with 52-foot blades, generating enough power for thousands of homes. The beauty? Fish can swim around them, though whether they always do is another question.

Tidal lagoons offer a compromise, creating artificial pools that fill and empty with the tides. Unlike barrages that span entire estuaries, lagoons can be built to minimize environmental disruption. Several UK projects are exploring this option, though none have reached commercial scale yet.

The newest kid on the block? Floating tidal platforms that bob on the surface with turbines underneath. No seabed construction, easier maintenance, and potentially less environmental impact. It's the kind of innovation that could make tidal energy accessible in places we never imagined.

Advantages of tidal energy

Predictable as clockwork

If renewable energy sources were employees, tidal would be the one who never calls in sick. While solar panels sleep at night and wind turbines sit idle on calm days, tides show up for work twice daily without fail. Grid operators love this reliability – it's baseload power that actually bases its load on something dependable.

This predictability transforms how we think about renewable energy. Power companies can schedule maintenance during slack tides, plan output months in advance, and integrate tidal generation into the grid without the headaches that come with intermittent sources. For a grid increasingly stressed by variable renewables, tidal energy offers a stabilizing force.

Dense energy, small footprint

Water is a heavyweight champion in the energy world – literally. At 830 times denser than air, moving water packs a serious punch. A tidal turbine can generate the same power as a wind turbine using blades one-third the size. This density advantage means tidal farms need far less space than their land-based cousins.

Consider South Korea's Sihwa Lake Tidal Power Station, spanning just 12.7 kilometers but generating 254 megawatts. To match that output with wind power, you'd need to cover an area roughly 20 times larger. For crowded coastlines and busy shipping lanes, this space efficiency matters enormously.

The numbers tell the story: while a good wind site might achieve 35-45% capacity factor (producing that percentage of maximum possible output), tidal installations regularly hit 40-60%. Some tidal barrages even reach 75% during spring tides. It's like comparing a marathon runner to a sprinter – both have their place, but tidal energy goes the distance.

Long-lasting infrastructure

Build a tidal plant today, and your grandchildren might still see it generating power. These facilities are the Energizer Bunnies of renewable energy, with expected lifespans of 75-100 years or more. La Rance has been churning out electricity since The Beatles were topping charts, and it's still going strong.

This longevity changes the economic equation dramatically. Yes, that $280 per megawatt-hour price tag looks steep compared to wind's $20, but spread those costs over a century instead of 20-30 years, and the math starts looking different. Add in minimal fuel costs (the moon works for free) and low maintenance requirements, and tidal energy becomes a long-term investment that actually makes sense.

Disadvantages of tidal energy

Environmental impacts on marine life

Here's where tidal energy hits troubled waters. Installing massive turbines or barrages in marine environments is like building a highway through a forest – something's going to get disrupted. Fish that have migrated through these waters for millennia suddenly face spinning blades or concrete walls. The underwater noise from turbines can interfere with marine mammals' communication, potentially affecting everything from hunting to mating.

The Annapolis Royal Generating Station in Canada offers a cautionary tale. After years of operation, authorities shut it down in 2021 due to its devastating impact on fish populations. It's a stark reminder that renewable doesn't automatically mean environmentally friendly.

Even newer, supposedly fish-friendly designs face challenges. Tidal turbines may not block entire rivers like barrages, but they still create what scientists call "artificial reefs" – structures that change water flow patterns and attract different species while repelling others. The long-term ecosystem effects remain poorly understood, making each new installation a bit of an experiment.

High costs and limited locations

If tidal energy were a restaurant, it would be the kind where you need a reservation months in advance and prices aren't on the menu. Current construction costs run $3,000,000 to $6,000,000 per megawatt for facilities over 10 MW – enough to make even wealthy investors think twice.

But money is just part of the problem. Tidal energy is pickier than a food critic when it comes to location. You need tidal ranges of at least 3 meters for barrages or current speeds above 1.5 meters per second for turbines. Add in requirements for deep water ports, minimal shipping traffic, and reasonable distance from protected marine areas, and suitable sites become rarer than beachfront property in Kansas.

The maintenance challenges compound these costs. Seawater corrodes everything it touches, marine growth clogs turbines, and underwater repairs cost fortunes. One project manager told me that maintaining tidal turbines was like "servicing a jet engine while it's submerged in salt soup." Not exactly a ringing endorsement for easy operations.

What challenges and costs do countries face when building tidal power plants?

Theory is one thing, but how does tidal energy perform in the real world? Let's examine three facilities that showcase both the promise and pitfalls of harvesting lunar power.

MeyGen, Scotland represents tidal energy's cutting edge. Operating in the Pentland Firth – waters so rough Vikings called them the "Swelki" (the Swallower) – this project proves tidal turbines can survive nature's worst moods. Since 2017, its underwater turbines have generated 252 MW of clean energy, accounting for an astounding 75% of global tidal electricity generation capacity. The secret? Treating the ocean with respect, using individual turbines that can be raised for maintenance rather than permanent structures.

Sihwa Lake, South Korea tells a different story – one of accidental success. Originally built as a seawall for land reclamation, the structure created an ecological disaster zone of stagnant, polluted water. Converting it to a tidal power station in 2011 saved the project, using the daily flush of tides to improve water quality while generating 552.7 gigawatt-hours annually. Sometimes the best renewable energy projects are the ones that fix existing problems.

La Rance, France is the grandfather of modern tidal power, operating since 1966. This facility proved tidal barrages could work but also demonstrated their environmental cost. The local ecosystem took a decade to recover from construction, and while it eventually found a new balance, the altered environment bears little resemblance to the original estuary. It's a 240-megawatt reminder that renewable energy requires careful planning.

Tidal energy vs. other renewables

Comparing tidal to wind and solar

Let's put tidal energy in the renewable family photo and see how it measures up. If solar is the popular kid and wind is the athlete, tidal is the reliable friend who always shows up on time but lives too far away to hang out often.

The efficiency numbers favor tidal dramatically – up to 90% energy conversion compared to solar's 15-22% or wind's theoretical maximum of 59%. But efficiency isn't everything. Solar panels now cost under $1,000 per kilowatt installed and work almost anywhere the sun shines. Wind turbines, at $1,300-2,200 per kilowatt, can pepper landscapes from Iowa to India. Tidal? Try $2,000-7,000 per kilowatt, and good luck finding a suitable site.

Yet tidal brings something unique to the table: capacity factor. While solar averages 25% and wind manages 35-45%, tidal installations regularly achieve 40-60%, with some barrages hitting 75%. It's the difference between a part-time and full-time employee – both valuable, but one provides more consistent output.

The storage solution potential

Here's where tidal energy might surprise you. Some tidal facilities can function as massive batteries through pumped storage systems. During low electricity demand, excess grid power pumps water into elevated reservoirs. When demand spikes, that water flows back through turbines, generating instant power.

This capability makes tidal installations perfect partners for intermittent renewables. Imagine a grid where solar powers the day, wind takes the night shift, and tidal facilities smooth out the gaps while providing baseline power. It's not just about generating electricity – it's about storing and dispatching it when needed most.

The future of tidal energy

The tidal industry stands at a crossroads. Projects like Wales' Morlais promise to create one of the world's largest tidal stream sites, while technological advances in floating platforms could open previously impossible locations. The market value tells an optimistic story – from $487 million in 2014 to a projected $11.3 billion by 2024.

But growth requires more than good intentions. The UK has pledged $213 million for marine energy research, while the U.S. explores sites in Alaska's Cook Inlet and along the Maine coast. These investments aim to solve tidal energy's fundamental challenges: reducing costs, minimizing environmental impact, and expanding suitable locations.

The real question isn't whether tidal energy works – La Rance has proven that for nearly 60 years. It's whether we can make it work affordably and sustainably enough to matter in the renewable energy mix. With climate change demanding every clean kilowatt we can generate, dismissing any carbon-free source seems foolish.

FactorTidal EnergyWind EnergySolar Energy
Energy Source
Gravitational pull of moon/sun
Moving air
Sunlight
Predictability
Nearly 100% (centuries ahead)
70-80% (days ahead)
70-80% (days ahead)
Capacity Factor
40-60% (up to 75% for barrages)
35-45% onshore
15-25%
Efficiency
Up to 90%
Up to 59% (Betz limit)
15-22%
Installation Cost
$2,000-7,000 per kW
$1,300-2,200 per kW
Under $1,000 per kW
Operating Cost
1-2 cents per kWh
2-6 cents per kWh
1-2 cents per kWh
Lifespan
75-100+ years
20-25 years
25-30 years
Environmental Impact
High (marine ecosystems)
Moderate (birds, noise)
Low (manufacturing)
Geographic Limits
Very high
Moderate
Low
Grid Value
Excellent (predictable baseload)
Good (semi-predictable)
Moderate (daytime only)

Tidal energy won't replace solar panels on rooftops or wind turbines in fields. But in the right locations, with careful environmental planning, it offers something invaluable: renewable baseload power as reliable as the moon itself. As we race toward a carbon-free future, that predictability might just be worth its weight in seawater.



Stay tuned

Learn about the latest arrivals and discounts first!

By clicking "Subscribe", I agree by electronic signature to: (1) receive marketing and other texts and messages from A1 SolarStore, directly or from third parties acting on its behalf, at the email address I entered above; (2) the Terms and Conditions; and (3) the Privacy Policy.